Re: Re: IMO

[Ray Henry <rehenry-at-up.net>]

Paul

I'd really rather see a complete set (minus all the fluff and empty stuff) so 
that we can build the new version with the same set of procedures that we use 
with the old.  It is confusing enough having both your BDI notions of compile 
and the install packups that I'm much more used to -- not to mention the new 
automake stuff from Will.

Ray




On Tuesday 13 May 2003 05:13 pm, you wrote:
> Hi Ray
>
> I'd favor just6 moving the essential src files across and leaving out empty
> directories and obsolete/redundant files.
>  Alternatively, just create a basic, but empty source tree and move the
> files across as they get changed.
>
> I'll put some work in on a core set of files for emcmot tomorrow and do a
> commit in the evening (lunch time for you).
>
> Regards, Paul.
>
> On Tuesday 13 May 2003 10:50 pm, Ray Henry wrote:
> > We thought we would put an existing copy of the emc stuff into
> > sourceforge with a new directory or modulename and then begin to hack it
> > up.  If this is the consensus, probably voted on by deafening silence, we
> > could do this before the weekend.  Then we would essentially leave the
> > existing set alone as a stable version.