RE: TKemc
- Subject: RE: TKemc
- From: Tim Goldstein <tgoldstein-at-mlh-services.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:36:19 -0700
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
The stepper systems are pretty demanding upon the computer compared to the
servo system. While I have heard that the servos will perform fine on a
Pentium 100 my experience with the steppers is that you need more
horsepower. Even between steppermod and freqmod there is a big difference in
resource demand. steppermod can seem to get away with something in the 266 -
333 range but freqmod needs a 450 or better. Of course if you are running
low step rates you will not need the processing power, but I really needed
it with 8,000 steps per inch and 180 ipm feed.
Tim
[Denver, CO]
> Hi everyone,
>
> Well with a little help from WIll S. and others I now have a
> running EMC
> system. I am running a Pentium 133 laptop with docking station, two
> parallel ports and an available slot for the Kaluga/Mauch DRO card for
> my CNC control machine. General performance seems to be adequate for
> control of my CNC Sherline 5400 mill and the table top bridge
> mill I am
> building.
>
> System configuration is as follows:
>
> Pentium 133 Laptop
> 48MB Ram
> 1.3 GB hard drive
> Floppy Drive
> Type 2 PCMCIA slot
> Docking Station with:
> two parallel ports
> Ethernet
> Slot for DRO card
> SCSI host adapter
> 2.0 GB SCSI drive
> Type 2 PCMCIA slots
>
> RedHat 6.2
> 2.2.14 Kernel
> rtlinux-2.2
> EMC 1.1-17 binaries.
>
> Camtronics 5AMP controllers (3)
>
> I am experiencing a couple of problems.
>
> 1. TKemc works fine when running sim.run but is impossible
> to use when
> running emc.run. Mouse movement is so slow you really can't do any
> thing productive. Xemc is works ok, mouse is a little slow
> but useable
>
> 2. Freqmod locks up the entire system, requiring power off reset.
>
> Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
> John Guenther
>
>
>
>
>
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Back to archive index |
Back to Mailing List Page
Problems or questions? Contact