Re: Rambling hydraulic post that was: Multiple syncronized spindle question.
- Subject: Re: Rambling hydraulic post that was: Multiple syncronized spindle question.
- From: Dave Engvall <dengvall-at-charter.net>
- Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 14:31:38 -0700
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
- Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
- In-Reply-To: <3D99E1D3.5554E7FB-at-pico-systems.com>
- User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/9.0.2509
On 10/1/02 10:54 AM, "Jon Elson" <elson-at-pico-systems.com> wrote:
>
> Dave Engvall wrote:
>
>> Hi list:
>> Not that I've done this but controlling the temp of the oil might help.
>> In this case one might have to warm to start with and then cool to maintain
>> but control to 0.1 C is pretty easy in a well stirred bath and you can get
>> two more orders of magnitude with out breaking the bank.
>
> All the high-end (read $100,000 plus) machines do this. The entire spindle
> head assembly is immersed in a temperature-controlled oil bath. Some
> circulate
> and cool the oil, some circulate water coolant in pipes in the head. But,
> thermal
> spindle growth is a major concern, and gets worse as the machines get larger.
> Some extra-high end machines also have hollow ballscrews, and run coolant
> through the screws to prevent expansion of them.
>
> Jon
Jon,
When I posted I was thinking of controlling the hydraulic oil temp to
minimize retuning; a bit more basic than temp comp for the spindle, etc.
dave
>
>
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Back to archive index |
Back to Mailing List Page
Problems or questions? Contact