Re: Thoughts on EMC's design and implemenation
- Subject: Re: Thoughts on EMC's design and implemenation
- From: Jon Elson <elson-at-pico-systems.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 00:25:20 -0500
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Organization: Pico Systems
- References: <20030.1031618685-at-www51.gmx.net>
- Sender: elson
Adam Hunt wrote:
> I have been interested in motion control for as long as I can remember. I
> stumbled upon EMC a year or so ago and have learned a lot from reading posts
> and source.
>
> I was currious if anyone had any thoughts about EMC's design and
> implementation. EMC and supporting software has been coded in a wide range of languages
> (I thought Tcl was dead :)). Why is that? I know that C has been the
> typical language to write this kind of software in but C++ is getting more and
> more popular across the board.
Most of EMC IS in C++. The real-time section is in plain C for some reason having to do
with older RT patch support.
I really don't think Tcl is dead at all. I'm using a project that is very largely based on
it
at work. And, Tcl, in this application, performs about 5x better than Java.
Jon
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Back to archive index |
Back to Mailing List Page
Problems or questions? Contact