Re: BDI-TNG

Subject: Re: BDI-TNG
From: Paul <paul.corner-at-tesco.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 23:55:39 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
In-Reply-To: <020601c21822$ed54af60$a4efa218-at-.bdfrd.tx.home.com>
References: <7f.263684f7.2a15d8ee-at-aol.com> <003b01c217d4$00bbabc0$0100a8c0-at-mcleodusa.net> <020601c21822$ed54af60$a4efa218-at-.bdfrd.tx.home.com>



Hi Bill

If the errors are along the lines of :-

"shem.cc 496: Shared memory buffers emcError and may conflict"

Just ignore them. Changing SHMEM_BASE_ADDRESS will have no affect in 
eliminating the warnings.

Regards, Paul.



On Thursday 20 Jun 2002 7:26 am, William Scalione wrote:
> Seems to run fine
> except I get tons of SHEM shared memory errors in my terminal
> window when EMC is running. Does not seem to hamper EMC
> though. I need to research this and possibly change my Shem
> base address or memory size in my INI file.

References:
- BDI
  - From: Webstercnc-at-aol.com
- BDI-TNG
  - From: "Shelbyville Design & Signworks" <signworks-at-mcleodusa.net>
- Re: BDI-TNG
  - From: "William Scalione" <wscalione-at-nc.rr.com>

Prev by Date: Re: is freqmode alway's the smoother option?
Next by Date: Re: is freqmode alway's the smoother option?
Prev by thread: Re: BDI-TNG
Next by thread: EMC Documentation

Date Index | Thread Index | Back to archive index | Back to Mailing List Page
Problems or questions? Contact