Re: BDI TNG

Subject: Re: BDI TNG
From: "Dean L. Hedin" <dhedin2001-at-home.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 11:16:40 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
In-Reply-To: <200201281825.g0SIOulW022696-at-hawksbill.nist.gov>
References: <E16Uq2J-0003oF-00-at-receipt.tesco.net> <200201281825.g0SIOulW022696-at-hawksbill.nist.gov>


Just wondering, why must steppermod dropped?
If anything I would think it would be less real-time intensive than freqmod.

In any case, I agree that the BDI could use an update, but I am sure
that this is easier said than done.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: BDI TNG
  - From: Paul <paul.corner-at-tesco.net>

References:
- BDI TNG
  - From: Paul <paul.corner-at-tesco.net>
- Re: BDI TNG
  - From: Maximilian HEISE <max.heise-at-gmx.net>

Prev by Date: Re: BDI TNG
Next by Date: Probing update.
Prev by thread: Re: BDI TNG
Next by thread: Re: BDI TNG

Date Index | Thread Index | Back to archive index | Back to Mailing List Page
Problems or questions? Contact