Re: INIVAR ERROR

Subject: Re: INIVAR ERROR
From: Paul <paul.corner-at-tesco.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 13:30:36 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
In-Reply-To: <200201050200.g0520Gu06666-at-btc1.up.net>
References: <010301c1956e$e6b50a10$4701a8c0-at-hotpuppy.com> <E16MeP4-0005S1-00-at-scanner.tesco.net> <200201050200.g0520Gu06666-at-btc1.up.net>

Hi Ray

Just the folks in Redmont trying to impose their "standards" on the rest of 
the world.

Regards, Paul.

On Saturday 05 January 2002 2:06 am, Ray wrote:

> You mean there was other stuff in there?  Is my system getting old like me
> or are some folk/businesses just trying to make me think so?

References:
- INIVAR ERROR
  - From: Brian Greul <bgreul-at-swbell.net>
- Re: INIVAR ERROR
  - From: Paul <paul.corner-at-tesco.net>
- Re: INIVAR ERROR
  - From: Ray <rehenry-at-up.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Kernel Version, RT Linux Version, what EMC Version?
Next by Date: compile problem
Prev by thread: Re: Kernel Version, RT Linux Version, what EMC Version?
Next by thread: Install nightmares! HELP! RH 6.2 Krnl 2.2.14-RTL2.2

Date Index | Thread Index | Back to archive index | Back to Mailing List Page
Problems or questions? Contact