Re: EMC - a practical implementation?

["Steve Carlisle" <quatsein-at-island.net>]

Tim, we have been there, done that, I think his name
was Hoyt.

Steve

----------
From: Tim Goldstein <tgoldste-at-mlh-services.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <emc-at-nist.gov>
Subject: RE: EMC - a practical implementation?
Date: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 9:43 PM


StevieB,

If you have no interest in EMC and only want to berate people that are
happy
using it, why are you wasting your oh so valuable time on a list that is
only about this software product that you feel is a waste of your time?

I have offered to invest my valuable time (and no you do not have any right
decide for me what is a waste or investment of this precious time) and help
you set up a machine on EMC. It seems you are more interested in tearing
the
package down that actually tying it and seeing if it serves your needs.

Tim
[Denver, CO]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: emc-at-nist.gov [emc-at-nist.gov]On Behalf Of Stephen B.
> Patterson
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 9:57 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: Re: EMC - a practical implementation?
>
>
>
> Ray,
>
> Nope, no software religionist am I.   And since those at NIST
> have not seen
> fit to use the same type of development environment as Mr. Torvalds, I
see
> no common benefit, and refuse to be snookered by an enticing piece of
free
> software (Gosh, wouldn't it be neat if it worked on MY machine?)
>
> But, regardless of whether or not the software is free or costs a
thousand
> dollars a copy, I refuse to compile, test and debug someone
> else's software
> for free.  I do believe that my time and effort (and your time and
effort)
> are best spent elsewhere.
>
> Do you think these NIST software gurus think that ALL of us are
> that gullible?
>
> And I've only been in the business since 1975.
>
>
> StevieB
> >