Re: EMC - a practical implementation?

Subject: Re: EMC - a practical implementation?
From: George Potter <gpotter-at-cwnet.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 21:43:12 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
References: <3.0.6.32.20000712171733.007d4100-at-mail.chisp.net> <17.817f688.269ce6fb-at-aol.com> <3.0.6.32.20000712171733.007d4100-at-mail.chisp.net> <3.0.6.32.20000712220858.007d7ca0-at-mail.chisp.net>

So how many microsoft programs do you use?

A bit more seriously, many "comercial" programs are buggy
and actually are "works in progress" .....  how many programs
do you have version 1 of, and still use in your business.

And when using commercial programs (meaning you paid for it),
how many times have you had to BUY the next version to get
a bug fix.

Regards,
George Potter

"Stephen B. Patterson" wrote:

> My point is that my time is valuable and I refuse to do testing and
> debugging of ANY software for free.
>
> StevieB

References:
- EMC - a practical implementation?
  - From: "Stephen B. Patterson" <stevieb-at-chisp.net>
- Re: STG2 - Latest Developments
  - From: JohnDRoc-at-aol.com
- Re: EMC - a practical implementation?
  - From: "Stephen B. Patterson" <stevieb-at-chisp.net>

Prev by Date: RE: EMC - a practical implementation?
Next by Date: Re: EMC - a practical implementation?
Prev by thread: Re: EMC - a practical implementation?
Next by thread: Re: EMC - a practical implementation?

Date Index | Thread Index | Back to archive index | Back to Mailing List Page
Problems or questions? Contact