Re: PID tuning

Subject: Re: PID tuning
From: Ray Henry <rehenry-at-up.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 19:55:11 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
In-Reply-To: <38C43953.C4A0E075-at-cme.nist.gov>
References: <3.0.5.32.20000305101707.007c0b00-at-pop.up.net>

At 06:05 PM 3/6/2000 -0500, Fred wrote:

<snip that described NIST guest tuning procedures>

>I ran this on the Bridgeport and the resulting gains outperformed my
>manually tuned gains for current mode (no tach), and equalled the
>manually tuned gains (with a FF1 feedforward term) in velocity mode
>(with a tach).

Okay, I'll bite.  What amps and kinds of signals did you use.  Did you use
the same amps for both halves of the test?  If so, how did you defeat the
current loop or did you simulate the tach when you didn't use one?

Call me curious!

Ray

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PID tuning
  - From: Fred Proctor <proctor-at-cme.nist.gov>

References:
- PID tuning
  - From: Ray Henry <rehenry-at-up.net>
- Re: PID tuning
  - From: Fred Proctor <proctor-at-cme.nist.gov>

Prev by Date: Re: PID tuning
Next by Date: Re: Homebrew STG card - CRAZY-7
Prev by thread: Re: PID tuning
Next by thread: Re: PID tuning

Date Index | Thread Index | Back to archive index | Back to Mailing List Page
Problems or questions? Contact