RE: EMC compatible computers



Jon,
Did I miss  something. Isn't 10 Mb ethernet about as fast as the parallel
port?

Dave Engvall

-----Original Message-----
From: emc-at-nist.gov [emc-at-nist.gov]On Behalf Of Jon Elson
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 10:31 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Re: EMC compatable computers





John Sheahan wrote:

>sorry for the abbreviation  GbE == Gigabit Ethernet
>often run on fibre - which may be appropriate for noise reasons here.
>
>I don't see the extra speed as a bonus for this app.
>
>
>
Note that ALL ethernets, thick-wire, thin-wire and twisted-pair, are
electrically isolated
by transformers.  If there was no other traffic on the ethernet segment,
I think even
10 Megabit/sec ethernot would work for this application.  100 MB/S would
definitely
be sufficient.  With proper attention to keeping the protocol simple, I
would think a
message to each axis drive would only be a couple of bytes, so each
message could
be just tens of microseconds long.

Jon





Date Index | Thread Index | Back to archive index | Back to Mailing List Page

Problems or questions? Contact