RE: Rambling hydraulic post that was: Multiple syncronized spindle question.
- Subject: RE: Rambling hydraulic post that was: Multiple syncronized spindle question.
- From: "Eric Keller" <eek105-at-psu.edu>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:08:32 -0700
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <200209271327.g8RDRt57021919-at-btc1.up.net>
Ray Henry says:
If using hydraulic rams is an experiment, go for it and report back. I
do know there is a fellow that has some plans to build a hexapod test
machine using hydraulic rams. My short answer for a production machine
is I wouldn't. Read on if you're interested in the details of why I say
this.
...
Much snippage
It appears that the world is going to electric motors for Stewart Platforms.
Hydraulics are obviously a good choice for such machines. MTS now sells
a very quiet hydraulic power supply unit for large numbers of American $.
Otherwise, I can't stand to listen to another pump.
I wrote a digital controller for a hydraulic load frame. It works very well,
except that it does have significantly lower errors once the fluid is up to
temp. I am porting the software from dos to RTlinux to see if I can clear
things up using a floating point controller, because I am having numerics issues.
I'm sure you could put servovalves on tracermills and get good performance.
I don't think I would do it unless my aversion to soaking my hands in hydraulic
oil magically goes away.
Eric
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Back to archive index |
Back to Mailing List Page
Problems or questions? Contact