Re: EMC Bug List

Subject: Re: EMC Bug List
From: Jon Elson <elson-at-pico-systems.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 23:06:57 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Pico Systems
References: <1026918222.2352.91864.m3-at-yahoogroups.com> <006001c22db0$e8760d60$1f02a8c0-at-SYSTEM12> <02071800103000.13233-at-linux.workgroup> <20020718203840.EDWS4642.mta2-svc.business.ntl.com-at-there>
Sender: elson

Paul wrote:

> Hi Matt
>
> With the number of RH6.x/RTL3.0 (BDI) installs around the globe, is there
> much to be gained in continued support of RH5.2 and RTL0.9J systems ?

Well, I'm still using it.  Once I get my PPMC hardware working with the BDI,
I will do some real live machine testing, and decide to move up to BDI or not
yet.  My Bridgeport is run on a RH5.2 - RT0.9J system with a STG board.
It lacks a number of features, but it is rock solid.

Jon

Follow-Ups:
- need help finding unresolved symbols
  - From: Jon Elson <elson-at-pico-systems.com>

References:
- EMC Bug List (was G92)
  - From: Matt Shaver <mshaver-at-erols.com>
- Re: EMC Bug List
  - From: Paul <paul.corner-at-tesco.net>

Prev by Date: Re: EMC Bug List
Next by Date: Introduction on ADSL
Prev by thread: Re: EMC Bug List
Next by thread: need help finding unresolved symbols

Date Index | Thread Index | Back to archive index | Back to Mailing List Page
Problems or questions? Contact