Re: All Axes missing with motion code?

[Ray Henry <rehenry-at-up.net>]

Art

You are correct about needing some work on verify and the error message 
routine.  It got broken when we upgraded to a six axis interpreter.  The folk 
at NIST have been very busy with a different interpreter.  They should be 
through with that in the next month.  Perhaps then we can get this little 
annoyance repaired.

When I want to verify, I set debug to the max in the ini and start the emc 
from a terminal.  That way I can look over the list of messages for problem.

Ray


On Saturday 20 April 2002 09:23 am, you wrote:
> Tim, Dean,
> Thanks for the quick replies.  I tried both methods and
>
> it IS the following line which is truly bad:
> >G03 X-0.1521 Y-0.4102 I0.3662 J0.2394
> >BAD=> G01 Z0.1
>
> REALLY BAD=> G90 G00 G49
>
> >X0 Y0 Z0.1
> >M2
>
> I replaced it with:
> G90 G00 X0 Y0 Z0.1 G49
>
> and it is happy now.
>
> Are there any plans to improve program verification?
> I would suggest:
>
> If error is found, show line number and full text of
> offending line in Message Box.
>
> If specific word is wrong, say "M454 ", then isolate it in the error output
> too.
>
> There is uncertainty about loading/verifying programs through the GUI.
> Usually I load it once, press verify and ignore results, then press verify
> again.
>
> Art
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> http://www.hotmail.com