Re: Usefullnes of the EMC List

[Brian Greul <bgreul-at-swbell.net>]

I've tried using everything from 5.x redhat to 7.2 redhat.  I spent alot of
time in the 6.x series.
-Brian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Cook" <kf2qd-at-terraworld.net>
To: "Multiple recipients of list" <emc-at-nist.gov>
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 6:55 AM
Subject: Re: Usefullnes of the EMC List


>
> What version of Linux are you using? What is your level of experience with
> Linux? (that's probably the hardest part...) Most of the info is out there
> but it takes a bit to put it together in a way that makes sense.
>
> Pete
> >
> > I responded for help several times... all I got was chiding over my
email
> > client...
> > I still don't have a working EMC or a understanding of what it would
take
> to
> > get it working....
> > I have yet to muck with the BDI... but I don't think I should have to go
> > that route.
> >
> > This is by far the least useful / highest traffic list I'm on.
> >
> > A digest version would be a huge benefit.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Peter Cook" <kf2qd-at-terraworld.net>
> > To: "Multiple recipients of list" <emc-at-nist.gov>
> > Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2002 9:19 PM
> > Subject: Usefullnes of the EMC List
> >
> >
> > >
> > > WHat I have found that makes the EMC list useful is when someone askes
a
> > > question on just about any related topic. Recently there has been the
> > > implication that the list isn't very valuable - but it seems to me
that
> we
> > > get out what we put in. If the subscribers don't ask questions or give
> > there
> > > 2 cents worth fromtheir wn experience there won't be anything of value
> > here.
> > > Make the list valuable - share yur experience - you may have more than
> the
> > > next guy and save him some of the grief that you went through.
> > >
> > > Pete Cook
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>