Re: BDI TNG
- Subject: Re: BDI TNG
- From: "Matthew King" <mattking-at-knology.net>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 13:17:24 -0500
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Let me make sure I understand this, please - if steppermod were gone, EMC
can still very certainly drive a stepper system, it just take a bit more set
up on the freqmod?
Thanks,
Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul <paul.corner-at-tesco.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <emc-at-nist.gov>
Date: Sunday, January 27, 2002 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: BDI TNG
>
>
>Hi Dan
>
>Yes, freqmod would still be there as would smdromod.
>
> Alternative window managers will be included as per suggestion - You'd
loose
>the EMC icons though.
>
>Regards, Paul.
>
>
>On Sunday 27 January 2002 4:25 pm, Dan Falck wrote:
>> Paul,
>>
>> If you had to leave steppermod behind, would freqmod still be there? If
>> rtai is less bug prone, I would favor that. The licensing of rtai also
>> seems to be nicer than rtl.
>> On the computer speed, could you include a windows manager like icewm
>> that doesn't eat up as many recources as the stock kde wm (I was using
>> icewm for a while and it seemed a bit faster). How about the gui-less
>> 'curses' interface. Would that help with speed on an older machine?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dan
>
>
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Back to archive index |
Back to Mailing List Page
Problems or questions? Contact