Re: minimilltask V/S bridgeporttask

Subject: Re: minimilltask V/S bridgeporttask
From: "Darrell Gehlsen" <darrell-at-machinemaster.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 12:56:39 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
References: <NDBBLCIMBBDABGEAFDAACEJBCLAA.tgoldste-at-mlh-services.com> <39214E40.33E25B9C-at-nist.gov> <39219C54.B1338FB4-at-artsci.wustl.edu>



----- Original Message -----
From: Jon Elson <jmelson-at-artsci.wustl.edu>
>
> Ahh, wonderful.  I have a variable speed drive that takes 0-10 V
(unipolar)
> signals for speed control.  So, when you are working on this, please think
> about a .ini file parameter so that the speed can be made unipolar, and
> the direction set with the forward and reverse bits.  Looking forward to
this!
>
This would really make a servo to stepper driver interface using a VCO much
easier also. (unipolar and direction bits)
Darrell

References:
- minimilltask V/S bridgeporttask
  - From: "Tim Goldstein" <tgoldste-at-mlh-services.com>
- Re: minimilltask V/S bridgeporttask
  - From: Fred Proctor <frederick.proctor-at-nist.gov>
- Re: minimilltask V/S bridgeporttask
  - From: Jon Elson <jmelson-at-artsci.wustl.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: minimilltask V/S bridgeporttask
Next by Date: Re: new EMC release / rtlinux-2.2 problem
Prev by thread: Re: minimilltask V/S bridgeporttask
Next by thread: Re: minimilltask V/S bridgeporttask

Date Index | Thread Index | Back to archive index | Back to Mailing List Page
Problems or questions? Contact